hogwarts houses

User behavior types vs. Hogwarts houses

Earlier this year, I wrote several articles on how to document user personas, Hogwarts style.

Like, there are Gryffindorian how-to steps 1-2-3 good to go pal whoo-hoo you’re done! Or, you can have this very thorough, do-it-at-your-own-pace Hufflepuff tutorials with follow-up tasks that guarantee to put you on your feet. For our Slythery audience, we offer several quick&dirty pro tips, no bull. And yeah, Ravenclaw guys, those appendixes with super-tricky scenarios are for you.

…what a mess of styles, huh? 🙂 Anyhow, choose your house, and I’ll tell you more about what docs you’d enjoy!

https://informaze.wordpress.com/2016/03/02/user-behavior-types-vs-hogwarts-houses-part-1/ https://informaze.wordpress.com/2016/03/16/user-behavior-types-vs-hogwarts-houses-part-2/ https://informaze.wordpress.com/?p=1178&preview=true https://informaze.wordpress.com/2016/04/06/user-behavior-types-vs-hogwarts-houses-ravenclaw/

On the hush-hush side, I would love to write in an individual fun way for each of those houses. But since my invitation to Hogwarts has not arrived (yet!), for now, I am a Technical Communicator for enterprise software.

So, welcome to my world of neutral writing where jokes are not allowed.

Continue reading

Gryffindor wallpaper

User behavior types vs. Hogwarts houses (Gryffindor)

In documentation for applications that cover a wide market, we – Technical Communicators – often make it our point to target an ‘average user’. You know, the one who is neither too sloth nor too attentive, interested in both big picture and specific check box, and honestly, this list is endless.

But the majority of users does tend to lean one way or the other, follow a different ‘content beacon’.

Being a Potterhead, I could not help associating different user behavior types with Hogwarts houses.
And guess what – they match like the Weasley twins.

Sort your users and learn how to create a documentation that ticks for them!

Related articles







Continue reading